Following up on yesterday's post, in a more personal vein... To paraphrase a colleague of mine who recently saw this site and my personal site for the first time: "They're so evocative--your voice and your personality come through so clearly. Why wasn't that the case with N-TEN'?"
N-TEN is the Nonprofit Technology Enterprise Network, and for the last four years, I served as N-TEN's first Executive Director. N-TEN's mission is to help the nonprofit sector use technology more effectively, and it essentially operates as an association that brings together a diverse range of constituencies--nonprofits, consultants, vendors, funders and others.
During my tenure at N-TEN, it grew from a one-man staff, with an office in my living room and no members, to a four-person staff, bolstered by about half-a-dozen contractors, with a membership of some 350 organizations and an additional 300-odd individuals spread out across the U.S. and beyond. Although N-TEN's now big enough to be sustainable, for several years it was touch-and-go, and I was very focused on growth and reaching new constituents.
As a result, the identify that I established both for N-TEN and for myself was one that assuaged critics, established connections with new constituencies,
and developed relationships with prospective members. That emphasis on diplomacy and bridge-building opened a lot of doors for N-TEN, but it also defined the organization as an essentially ecumenical forum.
N-TEN has reached the point where it needs to do more than provide a forum--it needs to take stands on issues that matter to its members--it needs to have a voice. At the same time, I've been increasingly eager to speak my mind more freely, to be more candid and less diplomatic. But paradoxically, although my personal goals parallel those of N-TEN, I decided to step down as Executive Director.
One of the reasons is potential brand misalignment, the same issue I discussed yesterday. The success that N-TEN and I enjoyed over the past four years was due in part to the mutually reinforcing identities that the organization and I had established. But both N-TEN and I are now engaged in the process of re-making ourselves, to an extent--we're finding new voices. (As I've said to a number of colleagues, "I've been a bandleader for four years, and now I'd like to pick up an instrument of my own.") To meet these challenges, we'll both need to focus less on relationship-building and more on critical thought, analysis, and advocacy.
But the mutual reinforcement that worked so well for N-TEN and myself in the past could have worked against us in the future as we sought to do different things. I decided that the process would be easier, both for N-TEN and for myself, if we approached it separately, and it's looking like a sound strategy so far. My successor as N-TEN's Executive Director, Joe Baker, is a great guy who's just the right person to build on the organization's accomplishments while leading it in a new direction. And I'm having more fun than I've had in a long time--I feel intellectually liberated and much more free to be myself. There's certainly some risk involved, but it just felt like the right time to roll the dice.











Right on, Ed! Very insightful. I look forward to your next chapter.
Posted by: Jon Stahl | Feb 12, 2005 at 02:15 PM
Thanks, Jon--I appreciate the thumbs-up (especially from you, someone who witnessed N-TEN's growth from the initial concept to the present day.)
Posted by: Ed | Feb 12, 2005 at 05:22 PM