• The HBR Guide to Coaching Your Employees


    My Posts at HBR
Related Posts with Thumbnails

« Airport Express on Windows XP | Main | San Francisco Bay Trail »

Jan 07, 2006

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341e62fd53ef00d8349f541069e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference I'm Telling You for the Last Time:

Comments

Geof F. Morris

Ed: Well, the big issue with Last is that they try to offer the service for free indefinitely. That keeps it from scaling well. I happily give them money to allow them to keep operating.

The value of Last.FM is not just in your attention; it's in aggregating everyone's attention to pick up trends. Everyone doing this on their own in a distributed nature would reduce the value.

But then I'm a pretty passionate Last.FM user. :)

Ed

Geof, I agree that aggregation is key to unlocking aspects of attention data's value. But the choice we face isn't (or shouldn't be) between mass anonymous aggregation through a service such as Last and totally distributed data capture and analysis through individual data recorders.

Of course there are many advantages to be gained by sharing data with a large anonymous user base. But I'd much rather do that and also have the option to capture and analyze my own data for myself, and share it with specific individuals of my choosing.

By relying on Last to do it all for us--capture and analyze the data, aggregate the user base, and build services on top of that data--we're letting them hold us hostage. Bad idea.

And Last's model has flaws, even when it's up and running. What if I'd like to share my data with people who aren't Last users? What if I'd like to analyze and share not only my iTunes playlist but also other types of attention data? Etc.

More fundamentally, what is Last doing to allow me to own and manage MY data? Nothing, as far as I can tell--they're a black box. That completely violates AttentionTrust's principles, and it makes me uncomfortable.

I also don't think it's sustainable. I should have added a third lesson to my original post: As users come to realize the value of their attention data, they're going to want more control over that data. And Last is failing on that count right now.

Geof F. Morris

I grant you that they're not getting it wholly right. You might contact them---I think they'd be amenable to the concept. Their software has always been open source, so I can see AttentionTrust's principles as something that they'd embrace.

I don't think there's anything stopping you from building your own data store for the data you're shipping them---just not anything that uses the output from the Audioscrobbler family of plugins.

Ed

I've contacted them twice, hoping to get them involved with AttentionTrust. As you say, it would be a natural fit. Unfortunately, I haven't heard back from anyone there.

And Geof, you might be able to build your own data store, but I can't ;-)

To meet the needs of ordinary users like me, services like Last are going to have to become a lot more data-sharing-friendly, or they could find themselves losing out to attention data intermediaries like Root Markets.

Full disclosure: Root provides a range of support for AttentionTrust, and Root's CEO, Seth Goldstein, is a member of AttentionTrust's Board of Directors.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Recent Posts


  •  
    Archives