It's not uncommon for coaching clients to request a referral to a therapist, and on occasion I proactively suggest working with a therapist in addition to or instead of coaching. A list of therapists I recommend can be found below. While coaching is in some sense related to therapy, it's important to understand the limitations of coaching as a methodology, the situations in which it's not an appropriate or effective form of support, and the ways these two distinct forms of helping can complement each other.
The Distinction Between Coaching and Therapy
My own understanding of the distinction between coaching and therapy has been informed by a set of experiences with both disciplines: My coach is also a therapist, and my work with her beginning in 2001 has encompassed a range of professional and personal issues; my wife Amy and I benefited tremendously from our time in couples counseling after we completed graduate school; my father has been a practicing clinical psychologist for nearly 50 years; and I talk regularly with colleagues in both fields.
While the primary focus of my practice is on my clients' professional fulfillment and effectiveness, we frequently discuss a range of topics that transcend organizational life, in part because what's happening in the rest of our lives affects how we show up at work--and, of course, what's happening at work affects how we show up in other domains of life. In some cases these topics involve issues that a client should pursue with a therapist or in another helping relationship.
For example, I regularly talk with clients about anxiety, a common experience for leaders facing daunting responsibilities. Everyone is subject to anxiety at times, and coaching can be helpful in managing it at moderate levels. But severe anxiety (e.g. lasting for an extended period of time, pervasive across many domains of life, impeding normal functioning, accompanied by other physical or cognitive symptoms) requires treatment by a trained mental health professional.
I talk with all clients about their working relationships, and in many cases we discuss their personal relationships as well, typically because stress at work is affecting the quality of their home life, or stress at home is affecting the quality of their work. Again, coaching can be very effective in helping someone improve their relationships in all aspects of life. But I work with clients exclusively in 1:1 engagements, and beyond a certain point of difficulty in a relationship it's necessary for both parties to work jointly with a therapist or couples counselor.
And I talk with some clients about painful formative experiences, such as dysfunctional family dynamics, being bullied in adolescence, or early failures and struggles. Such events can have a lasting impact on our sense of self and our career, and in some cases clients raise these issues with me not seeking treatment or resolution, but because they want me to know more about their background so that I can better understand them and their current professional challenges. But in other cases these events result in trauma that needs to be addressed in therapy, not in a coaching engagement.
The Relationship Between Coaching and Therapy
When a client is considering both coaching and therapy, in some cases it's best to pause or defer coaching while the client completes a course of therapy. This may be because the issues appropriate to therapy are more urgent or problematic than the issues appropriate to coaching, and the former should be resolved before the latter can be addressed successfully. Or it may be that the client has a limited amount of time to spend in such conversations, and trying to pursue both simultaneously could leave them feeling "over-helped."
Also, in my practice I work with clients in long-term, open-ended engagements--the average tenure in my practice is currently 3 years--so it's likely that a course of therapy would be completed before a coaching engagement. (Although note that my practice is atypical in this regard--a report by HBR indicates that 90 percent of coaching engagements conclude within 18 months.)
But by no means is it necessary to pause or defer coaching in order to complete a course of therapy, and over the years I've worked with many clients who elected to pursue both simultaneously. In these circumstances the key is ensuring that the client is able to determine how these two helping relationships can complement each other. At times this is effected by drawing clear boundaries between the issues to be addressed in coaching and those to be addressed in therapy. As seen in the examples above, however, it may be unnecessary (or even counterproductive) to make such clear-cut distinctions.
I advise clients that we need to remain aware of the distinction between coaching and therapy in order to ensure that we're drawing upon my expertise as a coach and not trying to do work for which I'm untrained or unqualified. At the same time, if we interpret this distinction too broadly, we may fail to address important topics that transcend professional fulfillment and effectiveness--and as a result I may miss an opportunity to recommend therapy as an alternative or complement to coaching!
I never obligate clients to address any particular topics in the context of our work together--as a coach I'm not there to diagnose or even to propose an agenda. That responsibility is the client's. But a few years after launching my practice in 2006 I was working with a woman who was seeking to make a career transition. I thought we had successfully concluded our engagement when in one of our final conversations she disclosed that she'd been wrestling with a difficult personal issue that was much more important to her than her career. I felt that our work together could have enabled her to make progress in this area, and I asked why she hadn't discussed it with me sooner.
The reason was that her understanding of coaching presumed a sole focus on purely professional issues, and she didn't realize that our agenda could incorporate personal issues as well. Since then I've worked to ensure that clients understand that my approach to coaching is designed to support them as a whole person, and while there's never an obligation to discuss anything beyond their professional lives, there's always an open invitation to do so. This allows me to provide the help that will be most helpful--which may include recommending a therapist.
Therapists I Recommend
While the therapists I can recommend are primarily based in the San Francisco Bay Area, New York City, or Seattle I believe they're all open to working remotely, so geography need not be a constraint.
SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA
Chevalisa Bruzzone, Marriage and Family Therapist
Daniele Levy, Psychotherapy and Counseling
Dietmar Brinkmann, Psychotherapy for Individuals and Couples
Jay Sieff-Haron, Family Therapy San Francisco
Jonathan Horowitz and his colleagues at the San Francisco Stress and Anxiety Center
Sunny Sabbini, Partnership Coaching, Mediation and Couples Therapy
Ted Obbard, Practical Therapy for Men, Teens and Couples
CALIFORNIA AND WASHINGTON
NEW YORK CITY
Dror Nir, Clinical Social Worker
Heidi Leabman Gross, LCSW, Holistic Psychotherapy
Julia Andino, Emotional Landscaping
Paulina Castillo-Eisenbeis, New York City Counseling
Rob Handelman, Clinical Psychologist
Roger DeWitt, ADHD Coaching
Sheilah Mabry, Psychotherapist and LCSW
SEATTLE
Barbara Bouchet, Contact Point Associates
Dave Parrish, Healing Roots Counseling
Jeff Stuhmer, Counselor, LMCH, SUDP
Lawrence Smith, Consultation, Therapy and Counseling
Photo by Patrick Crowley.
